By Isr*eli Defense Minister Isr*el Katz has announced that Isr*eli forces will maintain their presence in Syria indefinitely, particularly in the demilitarized zone along the Golan Heights. This decision follows the collapse of President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, which has created a security vacuum on Isr*el’s northern border. Katz emphasized the strategic importance of holding Mount Hermon, a key vantage point overlooking Damascus and the Isr*eli-occupied Golan Heights.
Initially, Isr*el’s military presence in Syria was intended as a temporary measure to prevent hostile forces from establishing themselves in the region. However, the recent developments have led Isr*eli officials to reassess their strategy. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that Isr*eli forces would remain in the buffer zone until a force committed to the 1974 Separation of Forces Agreement could be established, ensuring security on Isr*el’s border.
The international community has expressed concern over Isr*el’s actions. The United Nations has condemned the occupation, stating that it violates the 1974 disengagement agreement between Israel and Syria. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called for an end to all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and urged all parties to uphold their obligations under the agreement. Despite international criticism, Israel maintains that its military presence in Syria is a defensive measure aimed at protecting its borders and preventing the transfer of strategic military assets to hostile entities.
Defense Minister Katz has ordered the military to prepare for a prolonged stay in the region, including during the harsh winter months, to ensure the security of Isr*eli forces operating in the area. In summary, Isr*el’s decision to occupy Syrian territory indefinitely reflects its strategic objectives in the region, particularly concerning the Golan Heights and Mount Hermon. While Isr*el asserts that these actions are necessary for national security, they have sparked significant international debate regarding their legality and potential impact on regional stability.
