By In a significant policy shift, President Donald Trump has authorized the delivery of 2,000-pound MK-84 bombs to Isr*el, reversing a hold implemented by former President Joe Biden. The Biden administration had paused this shipment due to concerns over potential civilian casualties, particularly in densely populated areas like G@za’s Rafah. These powerful munitions are capable of penetrating thick concrete and metal, resulting in a wide blast radius.
Trump justified the decision by stating that Isr*el had purchased these bombs and had been awaiting their delivery for an extended period. This move underscores the Trump administration’s commitment to bolstering Isr*el’s defense capabilities amid ongoing regional tensions. In addition to releasing the MK-84 bombs, the State Department has notified Congress of plans to sell over $7 billion in weapons to Israel. This extensive arms package includes thousands of bombs, missiles, and related equipment, with deliveries set to commence this year. Notably, the sale encompasses 3,000 Hellfire missiles, with deliveries expected to begin in 2028, necessitating additional training by the U.S. military.
The decision to proceed with these arms sales has sparked debate among U.S. lawmakers and international observers. Critics express concern that the deployment of such heavy munitions could exacerbate humanitarian crises in conflict zones like G@za, where civilian populations are at significant risk. Despite these concerns, the Trump administration maintains that strengthening Isr*el’s military arsenal is vital for the nation’s self-defense, particularly against Iran-backed militant groups such as Hamas in G@za and Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Isr*eli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed gratitude for the U.S. support, emphasizing the importance of these weapons in ensuring Isr*el’s security. The delivery of the MK-84 bombs and the proposed arms sale come at a delicate time, as a fragile ceasefire between Isr*el and Hamas holds. The international community continues to monitor the situation closely, weighing the implications of increased arms supplies on the prospects for lasting peace in the region.
